Evaluation of Kapita Selekta College of Islamic Education and its Impact on Student Solution Competence

Authors

  • Imam Muhayat Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Denpasar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55080/jpn.v3i1.53

Keywords:

Evaluation Course, Capita Selekta, Competency Solutions

Abstract

STAI Denpasar Bali was established in 2008. STAI Denpasar Bali emphasises the offline lecture process even though it is an independent campus. Only if it is not possible to do it offline can it be done online. Lectures in the Islamic Education course aside (KSPI) from theoretically applying practical lectures. The learning objectives are to improve the quality of being skilled at dealing with educational problems and being able to decipher solutions faced by educational institutions. Lecture strategy is a top priority. Starting from lesson planning, learning implementation, and the evaluation stage. In this study, the focus on evaluative strategies has an impact on students' solutive competence in solving problems, being able to implement theory, and being able to carry out new innovations. The evaluative strategy is meant here as a careful plan of activities to achieve specific goals. Meanwhile, solution competence is skilled at solving problems and finding solutions. This research uses an explanatory research method. These include the following value interval categories: 1. Very poor; 2. Less; 3. Enough; 4. Good; and 5. Very good. The indicator is very lacking. The design presented is irregular and does not solve the problem. On the other hand, the indicators are very good, the design is presented systematically, solves problems, can be implemented and is innovative. An analysis of the carrying capacity of activities serves as the foundation for all of this. The results of the study found that the evaluative strategy of the Islamic Education course (KSPI) had an impact on students' solutive competence and obtaining good grades.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ikhwan, A. (2021). Metode Penelitian Dasar (Mengenal Model Penelitian dan Sistematikanya). Tulungagung: STAI Muhammadiyah Tulungagung.

Baharuddin & Umiarso, Kepemimpinan Pendidikan Islam Antarara Teori & Praktik, (Yogyakarta, Ar-Ruzz Media: 2012).

Imron, Ali, Kebijakan Pendidikan di Indonesia Proses, Produk & Masa Depannya, (Jakarta, Bumi Aksara: 2008).Haryati, Mimin, Model & Teknik Penilaian pada Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan, (Jakarta, Penerbit Referensi: 2013)

Mulyadi, Evaluasi Pendidikan Pengembangan Model Evaluasi Pendidikan Agama Islam, (Malang, UIN Malang Press: 2010).

B. Uno, Hamzah & Lamatenggo, Nina, Teori Kinerja dan Pengukurannya, (Jakarta, Grafika Offset: 2012).

Fatah, Nanang, Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan, (Bandung, PT Remaja Roesdakarya: 2012). Faisal, Sanapiah, Format-format Penelitian Sosial, (Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010).

Fatah Yasin, Ahmad, Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia di Lembaga Pendidikan Islam, (Malang, UIN Malang Press: 2011

Daud Ali, Mohammad, Pendidikan Agama Islam, (Jakarta, PT Raja Grafindo Offset: 2011).

Muhayat, Imam, Humanitas Beragama (Kumpulan Esai Aestetika Sosial Moralis, Intelektual Profesionalis, dan Religioustitas Spiritualis), (Surabaya, Innofast Publishing: 2019).

Muhayat, Imam; Dkk., Pendidikan Agama Islam untuk Perguruan Tinggi Umum, (Yogyakarta, Tonggak Media: 2018).

Arikunto, Suharsimi, Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 2, (Jakarta, PT Bumi Aksara: 2013)

Rusman, Manajemen Kurikulum, (Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada: 2011).

Ikhwan, Afiful, Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) Untuk Kalangan Dosen, Guru, Guru Pendidik, Mahasiswa maupun Umum, (Tulungagung, STAIM Press: 2014).

Arifin, Zainal, Penelitian Pendidikan metode dan Paradigma Baru, (PT Remaja Rosda Karya Offset: 2011

Downloads

Published

27-02-2024

How to Cite

Muhayat, I. (2024). Evaluation of Kapita Selekta College of Islamic Education and its Impact on Student Solution Competence. Jurnal Pendidikan Nusantara, 3(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.55080/jpn.v3i1.53